How would private health insurance contribute to the accessibility of healthcare services?
Funding for private healthcare by the Health Insurance Fund has increased over the years, significantly boosting the number and proportion of outpatient visits to private clinics. The increased use of private healthcare is also attributed to the growth in purchasing power among Estonians – which, admittedly, has suffered greatly in recent years due to rapid inflation – but mainly due to the urgent need for faster medical care than the current public healthcare system can provide.
In recent years, employer-provided private health insurance has also grown rapidly. According to the Estonian Insurance Association, at the end of last year, over 55,000 employees, or nearly 8% of those employed in Estonia, were insured with private health insurance through their employers. However, this is countered by the small size of Estonian companies, which makes this business less attractive to insurers – nearly 40% of people work in companies with fewer than 20 employees. Although gradually more and more employers have shown interest in private health insurance, the actual number of payers is lower. Estonia is simply too small for two health insurance systems. As long as people can see a doctor at minimal cost, many are reluctant to incur additional expenses for treatment. The larger the market, the more affordable private health insurance would be for the customer. In conclusion, there are many challenges to funding the Estonian healthcare system and improving access to healthcare services for people.
Recently added ideas
- Supported 1
- Don't believe in the idea 0
7 thoughts about the healthcare sector’s main problems
- Health concerns are not solved by the healthcare sector alone in the big picture, but rather by the economic success of society and the understanding at all levels of society that investing in health is worthwhile.
- Considering the current state of healthcare in Estonia, the idea of a mega-hospital …
- Supported 15
- Don't believe in the idea 10
Emergency services for a fee
- Supported 13
- Don't believe in the idea 8
Additional suggestions
Emöke – Nr1: The workload of family doctors is extremely high. Nr2 and even more importantly: conducting any tests on a person without an indication is unethical, ineffective, and dangerous for the patient. If no tests are necessary for a person during a regular consultation, but a profit-oriented company offers ‘packages’ to interested individuals, then it is the responsibility of that person or the company where they order their service. People’s awareness should be raised that such packages are unnecessary and that they are a waste of money. A health audit is neither necessary nor an effective way to support a person’s health.
In our company, private medical insurance is provided to every employee who has completed their probation period (according to their tenure and position). But what should we think of a family doctor who refuses to comment on the results of a health audit from Synlab (which we funded and paid Synlab for a commentary), even though the same family doctor’s clinic sends their analyses to the same Synlab?!